Quote:
Originally Posted by
50-pence
➡️
Would be interested to hear your thoughts specifically on this compared to the TK. I run a mu into a vca on mixbus (not mastering) and settled on the TK BC1-THD*
*After owning (or demoing) obsidian, nekotronics ssl clone, api 2500+ and smart C2.
i have the tk bc2-me, not the bc-1thd, i don't know how much the 2 differ.
the tk and the roll are somewhat similar in direction, they are both vca compressors that have a more rounded, smooth character compared to an ssl - sometimes almost a bit reminiscent of an opto compressor.
the tk is more versatile on paper, partly because of the blend control.
even though it doesn't color much, it has an "electronic" sound in some ways - you can hear that it's an ic-based device - even if they are good ic's.
the rms755 has much less of that ic sound - it actually hardly sounds like an ic, more like a discret device - or a tube device, but without having a "tube coloration" - the "light", the "lively", "not dry", that is more reminiscent of tube than ic.
roll advertises a short signal path and high quality components in the audio chain - it sounds that way.
in addition, there is a feel of a "bigger knee", the compressor seems to attract a bit of sub information, almost like a vari mu.
in addition, the basses are felt to be larger and the stereo image wider, but this is not confirmed by measurement - this impression also had my assistant immediately.
at adjusted level, the signal is felt larger, wider and somewhat louder, more present with a nice finishing glue - not harsh at all.
someone once wrote that the sound sounds a little like when you press against a pillow - it is not a compressor that sounds like others like concrete, wood or rubber, it sounds more like "well filled pillow" - without smearing.